000			01743nab a2200205 4500
005			20260520004420.0
008			260224s2013 xxu ing
041			_aInglés
245	0	0	_aA Critical Comparison of Reduced and Conventional EOS Algorithms
260			_a _b _cabr. 2013
270			_a03/06/2013 ; 03/06/2013
300			_a10 p. ; 378-388
520			_aTranscripción del resumen del autor: Phase-equilibrium calculations can be a time-consuming part of process simulators and compositional reservoir simulations. Various authors have presented encouraging speed improvements based on reduced methods that can lower the computational cost by reducing the number of independent variables and thus generating a smaller system of equations to solve. This paper presents a careful comparison of conventional and reduced algorithms, showing that they can be expressed as linear transformations of each other. Consequently, the two sets of algorithms exhibit identical convergence behavior, and the performance gain of the reduced methods is entirely caused by reducing the cost of linear algebra operations. Performance benchmarks show much smaller speed-up numbers than seen in previously published material. Highly optimized linear-algebra operations significantly limit the opportunity for further speed improvement from reduced methods. Only a marginal speed-up potential is observed for mixtures with 15 components or less. This suggests that reduced methods may be less attractive for reservoir simulation than previously thought.
581			_a2
773	0		_tSPE Journal _g18
942			_cARTICULO
100	1		_aHaugen, Kjetill B. _953290
100	1		_aBeckner, Bret L. _953291
999			_c187743 _d187743