000			02010nab a2200193 4500
005			20260520004415.0
008			260224s2013 xxu ing
041			_aInglés
245	0	0	_aOptimization of Foam Enhanced Oil Recovery _bBalancing Sweep and Injectivity
260			_a _b _cfeb. 2013
270			_a09/04/2013 ; 09/04/2013
300			_a8 p. ; 51-59
520			_aTranscripción del resumen del autor: Foam is a means of improving sweep efficiency that reduces the gas mobility by capturing gas in foam bubbles and hindering its movement. Foam enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) techniques are relatively expensive; hence, it is important to optimize their performance. We present a case study on the conflict between mobility control and injectivity in optimizing oil recovery in a foam EOR process in a simple 3D reservoir with constrained injection and production pressures. Specifically, we examine a surfactant-alternating-gas (SAG) process in which the surfactant-slug size is optimized. The maximum oil recovery is obtained with a surfactant slug just sufficient to advance the foam front just short of the production well. In other words, the reservoir is partially unswept by foam at the optimum surfactant-slug size. If a larger surfactant slug is used and the foam front breaks through to the production well, productivity index (PI) is seriously reduced and oil recovery is less than optimal: The benefit of sweeping the far corners of the pattern does not compensate for the harm to PI. A similar effect occurs near the injection well: Small surfactant slugs harm injectivity with little or no benefit to sweep. Larger slugs give better sweep with only a modest decrease in injectivity until the foam front approaches the production well. In some cases, SAG is inferior to gasflood (Namdar Zanganeh 2011).
581			_a1
773	0		_tSPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering _g16
942			_cARTICULO
100	1		_aZanganeh, M. Namdar _952967
999			_c187585 _d187585