<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01934nmc a2200205   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520010347.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s        xxu                      </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Combination of managed pressure drilling and casing while drilling techniques</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Comparison, advantages and operational challenges</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">15/06/2017 ; 15/06/2017</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">14 p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The application of Managed Pressure Drilling technology has been proved to be beneficial to the well construction in wells with narrow operating windows where it is necessary to work in different scenarios of fluid losses and influxes. Despite its major advantages, MPD still depends on high density muds to kill the well during tripping out; these operations are performed in a delicate balance that can be lost causing well control events while tripping. However, the combination of MPD with casing while drilling (CwD) techniques has raised as a new alternative to continue optimizing drilling projects. This integration has brought new challenges within MPD engineering and the need to adapt procedures to this new methodology to obtain excellent results. The objective of this article is to analyze changes in MPD, comparing cases of wells drilled with conventional BHA and wells drilled with casing. Software simulation analysis will be utilized to compare advantages and looking for opportunities in order to improve efficiency</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="g"></subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CONGTP</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Hechem, Juan Ignacio</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">52715</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Caprini, Juan Jos&#xE9;</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">55281</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abraham, Facundo</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">55282</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="111" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Congreso Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Perforaci&#xF3;n, Terminaci&#xF3;n, Reparaci&#xF3;n y Servicio de Pozos (2do. : 2015 oct. 5-8 : Buenos Aires)</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">56622</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">190470</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">190470</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://biblioteca.iapg.org.ar/ArchivosAdjuntos/Congreso-Latinoamericano-y-del-Caribe-de-Perforaci n-Terminaci n,-Reparaci n-y-servicio-de-Pozos-2015/465.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">258289</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CDIAPG</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CDIAPG</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200062725</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200062725</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-06 00:20:32</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARCHIVO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
