<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02611nab a2200229   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520000318.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s2014    xxu                 ing  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ingl&#xE9;s</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Models for guiding and ranking well-to-well correlations channel bodies in fluvial reservoirs</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"></subfield>
    <subfield code="b"></subfield>
    <subfield code="c">oct. 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10/02/2015 ; 10/02/2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">22 p. ; 1943-1965</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transcripci&#xF3;n del resumen del autor: A probabilistic method has been devised to assess the geologic realism of subsurface well-to-well correlations that entail the lateral tracing of geologic bodies across well arrays with constant spacing. Models of geo-body correlability (based on the ratio between correlatable and penetrated geo-bodies) are obtained from total probabilities of penetration and correlation, which are themselves dependent on the distribution of lateral extent of the geo-body type. Employing outcrop-analog data to constrain the width distribution of the geo-bodies, it is possible to generate a model that describes realistic well-to-well correlation patterns for given types of depositional systems. This type of correlability model can be applied for checking the quality of correlation-based subsurface interpretations by assessing their geologic realism as compared with one or more suitable outcrop analogs. The approach is illustrated by generating total-probability curves that refer to fluvial channel complexes and that are categorized on the basis of outcrop-analog classifications (e.g., braided system, system with 20% net-to-gross), employing information from a large fluvial geo-body database, Fluvial Architecture Knowledge Transfer System (FAKTS), which stores information relating to fluvial architecture. From these total-probability functions, values can be drawn to adapt the correlability models to any well-array spacing. The method has been specifically applied to rank three published alternative interpretations of a stratigraphic interval of the Travis Peak Formation (Texas), previously interpreted as a braided fluvial depositional system, in terms of realism of correlation patterns as compared to (1) all analogs recorded in FAKTS and considered suitable for large-scale architectural characterization, and (2) a subset of them including only systems interpreted as braided.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="581" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">AAPG Bulletin</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">98</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Colombera, Luca</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">54378</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mountney, Nigel P.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">54379</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Felleti, Fabrizio</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">54380</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">McCaffrey, William D.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">42985</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">188770</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">188770</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">256589</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200060977</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200060977</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-06 00:18:52</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
