<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02594nab a2200205   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520002042.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s2013    xxu                 ing  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ingl&#xE9;s</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Subcool, fluid productivity, and liquid level above a SAGD producer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"></subfield>
    <subfield code="b"></subfield>
    <subfield code="c">sept. 2013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">05/02/2014 ; 05/02/2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">7 p. ; 360-367</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transcripci&#xF3;n del resumen del autor: Thermodynamic steam-trap control, or subcool control, in a typicalsteam-assisted gravity-drainage (SAGD) production is essential to the stabilityand longevity of the operation. It is achieved commonly through the control offluid production. The goal of such control is to maintain a steady and healthyliquid production without allowing steam from the injector to bypass to theproducer. Therefore, it is effectively a control of the liquid level above theproducer. Unfortunately, it is not practical to monitor this liquid level. Arule-of-thumb subcool-per-metre estimation of 10&#xB0;C/m of liquid level is popularin the industry; however it does not prove to hold in many situations. Thispaper presents a study of the dynamics of SAGD-production control with aresulting algebraic equation that relates subcool, fluid productivity, andwellbore drawdown to the liquid level above a producer. The main conclusions ofthis study include There is no minimum subcool value for a pure-gravity-drainage scenario;however, as the wellbore drawdown is considered, there is a minimum subcoolvalue in order to maintain the stability of fluid flow. For a given productivity, the liquid level increases as subcool increasesor as wellbore drawdown decreases. For each given set of operating parameters, there exists a criticalproductivity below which SAGD operation would halt. Before the steam chamber reaches the top of the reservoir, the fluidproductivity is limited by the vertical distance between the injector and theproducer; the larger the distance, the higher the fluid production rate canbe. A verification of this analysis was conducted by a series of numericalreservoir simulations. Although limited to two dimensions, we expect that thisanalysis captures the main physics amid the dynamic complexity ofSAGD-production control. The resulting algebraic equation can be used forbetter understanding of the dynamics of subcool control and for determiningoperation strategies.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="581" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">5</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">52</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Yuan, Jian-Yang</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">16324</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Nugent, Daniel</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53715</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">188075</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">188075</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">255894</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200060237</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200060237</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-06 00:18:04</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
