<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02080nab a2200205   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520004413.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s2012    xxu                 ing  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ingl&#xE9;s</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">A New Deconvolution Technique Based on Pressure-Derivative Data for Pressure-Transient-Test Interpretation</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"></subfield>
    <subfield code="b"></subfield>
    <subfield code="c">mar. 2012</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10/12/2012 ; 10/12/2012</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">13 p. ; 307-320</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transcripci&#xF3;n del resumen del autor In this paper, we present a new deconvolution method that removes the dependency of the deconvolved constant-rate drawdown responses on the initial reservoir pressure. It is well known that the late-time periods in particular of the deconvolved responses from the recent pressure-rate deconvolution methods are dependent on the initial reservoir pressure. A small error in the initial reservoir pressure could make a significant difference in the late-time periods of the deconvolved responses that can lead to an incorrect interpretation model, particularly misinterpretation of the boundaries. The new method presented is based on pressure-derivative data rather than pressure data that are used in all published deconvolution algorithms. Using pressure-derivative data in deconvolution leads to a nonlinear least-squares objective function that is different from those used in the earlier deconvolution methods and eliminates the dependency of the deconvolved responses on the initial reservoir pressure. Therefore, the new method minimizes incorrect interpretation because of an error or uncertainty in the initial reservoir pressure. We apply the new method to both simulated and field pressure-transient data sets. The results show that the new method offers a significant advantage over the earlier deconvolution methods for pressure-transient-test interpretation in cases where the initial reservoir pressure is unknown or uncertain.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="581" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">SPE Journal</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">17</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Onur, Mustafa</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">23663</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kuchuk, Fikri J.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">23662</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">187493</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">187493</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">255312</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200059612</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200059612</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-06 00:17:23</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
