<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03202nab a2200217   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520000315.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s2012    xxu                      </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Innovative methods for flow-unit and pore-structure analyses in a tight siltstone and shale gas reservoir</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"></subfield>
    <subfield code="b"></subfield>
    <subfield code="c">feb. 2012</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">08/05/2012 ; 07/05/2012</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">19 p. ; 355-374</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transcripci&#xF3;n del resumen del autor: Tight gas reservoirs are notoriously difficult to characterize using laboratory-based methods because of: the existence of heterogeneity at several scales; fine pore structure that may not correlate to depositional controls and environment due to theimpact of diagenesis; stress sensitivity of porosity and permeability; sensitivity of permeability to fluid saturation; and nonDarcy flow effects under laboratory conditions, etc. Porosity, pore size distribution and permeability are correspondingly difficult to measure in the laboratory and upscale to reservoir scale. A promising technique to characterize flow heterogeneity in tight gas reservoirs is to relate permeability to dominant pore throat size; permeability is measured using steady- or nonsteady-state techniques and dominant pore size is typically estimated using the mercury intrusion method. Permeability and porosity is measured on full-diameter core or core plugs which may contain heterogeneities that are at a much finer scale than the sample size, resulting in composite estimates of both properties. We investigate the use of non-routine methods to characterize permeability heterogeneity and pore structure of a tight gas reservoir for use in flow unit identification. Profile permeability is used to characterize fine-scale (&lt; 1 inch) vertical heterogeneity in a tight gas core; over 500 measurements were made. Profile permeability, while useful for characterizing heterogeneity, will not provide in-situ estimates of permeability; further, the scale of measurement is much smaller than logscale. Pulse-decay permeability measurements collected on core plugs under confining pressure were used to correct the profile permeability measurements to in-situ and point averages of profile permeability were used to relate to log-derived porosity measurements. Finally, a new method (for tight gas) was used to estimate the pore size distribution of several tight gas samples: N2 adsorption. A uni- or bi-modal distribution was observed for the samples, with the larger peak corresponding to the dominant pore throat radius, as inferred from the rp35 calculations. Further, the adsorption-desorption hysteresis loop was used to interpret the dominant pore shape as slot-shaped pores, which is typical of many tight gas reservoirs. The N2 adsorption method provides for rapid analysis and does not suffer from some of the same limitations of Hg-injection, however the method is limited to fine pore structures (&lt; 1,000 nm).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="581" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">AAPG Bulletin</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">96</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Clarkson, Christopher R.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">52557</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Jensen, Jerry L.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">42846</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pedersen, Per Kent</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">52558</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Freeman, Melissa</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">52559</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">187145</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">187145</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">254964</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200059251</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200059251</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-06 00:16:52</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
