<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02438nab a2200205   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520002025.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s2011    xxu                      </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Transient nonisothermal fully coupled wellbore/reservoir model for gas-well testing</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Part 1: Applications</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"></subfield>
    <subfield code="b"></subfield>
    <subfield code="c">sep./oct. 2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20/10/2011 ; 20/10/2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20 p. ; 51-70</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transcripci&#xF3;n del resumen del autor. After the development of a numerical fully implicit nonisothermal wellbore/reservoir simulator in Part 1 of this study (Bahonar et al. 2010), this simulator is implemented for a close and detailed study of gas-well pressure-drawdown (DD) and -buildup (BU) tests. Overall, the developed simulator is an accurate and strong tool for design and analysis of transient gas-well testing, particularly for high- pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) gas reservoirs. Several numerical results will be presented. This includes demonstration of the behaviour of the wellbore-fluid pressure, temperature, density, and velocity and an overall heat-transfer coefficient during DD or shut-in tests for nonisothermal reservoirs and conceptual comparisons with the isothermal counterparts. Thermal effects on the behaviour of derivative plots and the sandface-flow rate of deep nonisothermal gas reservoirs will be studied. A significant effect of neglecting the heat capacity of tubular and cement materials on the wellhead-temperature simulation, and thus transient well tests, will be demonstrated. A sample case to show that neglecting the thermal effects in the gas-well tests of composite reservoirs leads to unreliable results in well-testing analysis will be presented. Several other numerical experiments, including the presence of a variable wellbore-storage coefficient, gas backflow from the wellbore to the reservoir, and other thermal effects during the gas-well tests, are also presented. Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent every year on well testing around the world (Hawkes et al. 2001). A proper design and truthful interpretation of these tests can be achieved by a reliable coupled wellbore/reservoir simulator, which in turn can save a large portion of the required costs.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="581" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9/10</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">50</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bahonar, M.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">44253</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Azaiez, J.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">44254</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Chen, Z.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">12420</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">186209</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">186209</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">254028</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200058302</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200058302</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-06 00:11:37</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
