<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01615nab a2200193   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260608201740.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s2011    xxu                      </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Makar, Karter H.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">51779</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kamel, Mostafa H.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">17332</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">An approach for minimizing errors in computing effective porosity in reservoir of shaly nature in view of Wyllie-Raymer-Raiga relationship</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"></subfield>
    <subfield code="b"></subfield>
    <subfield code="c">jun. 2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">27/09/2011 ; 27/09/2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">7 p. ; 386-392</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transcripci&#xF3;n del resumen del autor. Effective porosity ( E) in clean and shaly formations is evaluated based on a newly introduced formulation that requires acoustic-radiation data and provides superior accuracy over other commonly used formulae based on various porosity tools. This equation, which is termed as a second order acoustic porosity-Vsh model, relates acoustic transit time to matrix and fluid in addition to shale parameters. In both clean and shaly formations, this relationship can be applied safely for evaluating effective porosity specifically for old wells that suffer from insufficient logging data such as density-neutron logs and in the absence of core regardless the differences observed. It can also be considered as a quick-look approach in interpreting the recent exploratory wells before the decision of completing the logging measurements. Successfulness of applying the proposed equation for evaluating " " to real field data is justified as far as reliability and range of accuracies are concerned.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="581" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">3-4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="g"></subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">185926</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">185926</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">253745</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200058018</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200058018</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-06 00:11:19</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
