<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01377nab a2200181   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520004223.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s2008    xxu                      </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Modeling underwater penetration of LNG carrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"></subfield>
    <subfield code="b"></subfield>
    <subfield code="c">dic. 2008</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">11/05/2011 ; 11/05/2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9 p. ; 336-344</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transcripci&#xF3;n del resumen del autor. An underwater breach of a tank in a double-hulled LNG carrier poses several challenging questions to be addressed by an adequate model. This article describes a model that accounts for the following phenomena: (1) LNG tank vapor space pressure decreasing by the piston effect of outflow (the effect a decreasing water level pulling down the pressure); (2) LNG evaporation in the hull space and vapor outflow through the outer breach; (3) LNG outflow and gas inflow to the LNG tank at the inner breach; (4) Ice formation by LNG evaporative cooling. The model does not allow for localized ice build up at the inner breach constricting flow. Predictions show tank pressure, LNG outflow rates, water inflow rates over time, the duration of the event, and total LNG losses. Losses are shown to be considerably less with double-hull than with single hull construction.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="581" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">Process safety progress</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">27</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Woodward, John L.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">38613</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">181638</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">181638</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">249457</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200053671</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200053671</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-05 23:51:48</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
