<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00995nab a2200169   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520004104.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s2009    xxu                      </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">New Nabucco challenges</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"></subfield>
    <subfield code="b"></subfield>
    <subfield code="c">feb. 2009</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">22/09/2010 ; 22/09/2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">3 p. ; 24-26</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transcripci&#xF3;n del resumen del autor. Last May, Petroleum Review reported on the progress of negotiations between Nabuco pipeline project coordinators and the four EU transit countries, and the obstacles raised by Turkey to the realisation of the 3,000-km pipeline that could deliver up to 31bn cm/y of natural gas to Europe from Central Asia and the Middle East. Here, Mojgan Djamarani highlights the dramatic developments on the international political and financial scene since the summer of 2008, which have posed new challenges that could put the future of the project in seriuos doubt</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="581" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">745</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">Petroleum Review</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">63</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">177113</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">177113</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">244932</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200049048</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200049048</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-05 18:58:13</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
