<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00950nab a2200181   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520002836.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s2010    xxu                      </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Internal corrosion from galvanic anode cathodic interference</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Phorgotten phenomena</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"></subfield>
    <subfield code="b"></subfield>
    <subfield code="c">dic. 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10/12/2010 ; 10/12/2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">4 p. ; 34-37</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transcripci&#xF3;n del resumen del autor. Cathodic interference is a common problem caused by the effect of stray current on one structure from the cathodic protection (CP) system on another structure. Although this phenomenon is nearly always associated with impresed current CP, it can occur with galvanic anode CP systems. This article desccribes a case study of a situation where galvanic CP caused cathodic interference in an unusual way</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="581" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">12</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">Materials Performance</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">49</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Fitzgerald, John H.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">22595</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">172318</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">172318</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">240137</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200050294</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200050294</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-05 16:08:06</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
