<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02461nab a2200193   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520000225.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s2009    xxu                      </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Upscaling two-phase flow in naturally fractured reservoirs</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"></subfield>
    <subfield code="b"></subfield>
    <subfield code="c">nov. 2009</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">17/06/2010 ; 17/06/2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">12 p. ; 1621-1632</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transcripci&#xF3;n del resumen del autor. Simulation grid blocks of naturally fractured reservoirs contain thousands of fractures with variable flow properties, dimensions, and orientations. This complexity precludes direct incorporation into field-scale models. Macroscopic laws capturing their integral effects on multiphase flow are required. Numerical discrete fracture and matrix simulations show that ensemble relative permeability as a function of water saturation (kri[Sw]), water breakthrough, and cut depend on the fraction of the cross-sectional flux that occurs through the fractures. This fracture-matrix flux ratio (qf/qm) can be quantified by steady-state computation. Here we present a new semianalytical model that uses qf/qm and the fracture-related porosity (f) to predict kri(Sw) capturing that, shortly after the first oil is recovered, the oil relative permeability (kro) becomes less that that of water (krw), and krw/kro approaches qf/qm as soon as the most conductive fractures become water saturated. To include a capillary-driven fracture-matrix transfer into our model, we introduce the nonconventional parameter Af,w(Sw), the fraction of the fracture-matrix interface area in contact with the injected water for any grid-block average saturation. The Af,w(Sw) is used to scale the capillary transfer modeled with conventional transfer functions and expressed in terms of a rate- and capillary-pressure-dependent kro. All predicted parameters can be entered into conventional reservoir simulators. We explain how this is accomplished in both, single- and dual-continua formulations. The predicted grid-block-scale fractional flow (fi[Sw]) is convex with a near-infinite slope at the initial saturation. The upscaled flow equation therefore does not contain an Sw shock but a long leading edge, capturing the progressively widening saturation fronts observed in numerical experiments published previously.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="581" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">11</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">AAPG Bulletin</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">93</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Matth&#xE4;i, Stephan K.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">42975</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Maghami-Nick, Hamidreza</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">42976</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">171187</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">171187</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">239006</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200046045</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200046045</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-05 15:13:33</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
