<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01307nab a2200181   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520001758.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s2010    xxu                      </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Analysis of fluid loss data II</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Models for dynamic fluid loss</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"></subfield>
    <subfield code="b"></subfield>
    <subfield code="c">feb. 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">17/06/2010 ; 17/06/2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">7 p. ; 191-197</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transcripci&#xF3;n del resumen del autor. Fluid loss during fracturing limits the efficiency of the process. Modeling of fluid loss is important for prefrac design and postfrac analysis. The fluid-loss process is complex and difficult to accurately model theoretically because many of the parameters are difficult or impossible to evaluate. This has led to the use of empirical and semi-empirical models some of which work better than others. Testing protocols also influence the quality of the data on which these models are based. In this paper, we review some of the currently used models and propose two different models that provide better fits to the available data than currently existing models. We also discuss the influence of core length on the experimental data and modeling of this data.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="581" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">3-4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">Journal of Petroleum Science &amp; Engineering</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">70</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Clark, Peter E.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">42931</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">171154</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">171154</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">238973</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200046012</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200046012</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-05 15:13:31</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
