<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01569nab a2200181   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520001747.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s2009    xxu                      </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">A simplified analytical method for estimating the productivity of a horizontal well producing at constant rate or constant pressure</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"></subfield>
    <subfield code="b"></subfield>
    <subfield code="c">feb. 2009</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">07/05/2009 ; 07/05/2009</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10 p. ; 77-87</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transcripci&#xF3;n del res&#xFA;men publicado por el autor: In this work, we present an analytical method for estimating the productivity of an infinite-conductivity horizontal well in a closed, box-shaped reservoir producing at either a constant rate or a constant pressure. It is based on approximate analytical solutions for the 2D inflow performance of an infinite-conductivity fracture in a rectangular drainage area and the near-well pressure drop for flow to a circular well in a vertical cross-section of the reservoir. The method can accommodate reservoirs with arbitrary horizontal and vertical aspect ratios, off-center wells, permeability anisotropy and skin factors. Being simple and straightforward, the method can be readily implemented in a standard spreadsheet program. Well productivities for depletion at constant rate are always higher than at constant pressure. The difference can be as much as 22% for a fully penetrating well in a thin, isotropic reservoir.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="581" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1-4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">Journal of Petroleum Science &amp; Engineering</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">64</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Hagoort, Jacques</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">37873</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">169690</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">169690</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">237509</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200044498</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200044498</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-05 15:11:56</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-05</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARTICULO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
