<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01376nmc a2200205   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520005826.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s        xxu                      </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CD I249 1 0013788</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ohsumi, Takashi</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">22473</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="110" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">International Gas Union, IGU</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">13105</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="111" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">World Gas Conference (22nd. : 2003 jun 1-5 : Tokyo)</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">22029</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Aquifer sequestration of CO2: a comparison with the direct ocean disposal</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">12/09/06 ; 22/07/2003</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">7 p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Disponible en CD en formato PDF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transcripci&#xF3;n del abstract original del autor: This report is an essay by a geochemist on the comparison between aquifer and ocean sequestration of CO2. The main driving force for the sequestered carbon dioxide to escape from the injection point is the buoyancy in both concepts The striking difference in the CO2 behaviors between the cases of aquifer and ocean sequestration is the free water body availability, which explains well the timescale of CO2's returning to the atmosphere. For the leakage concerns, the carbon cycle consideration will give clues on the ocean sequestration case, while a possible self-sealing mechanism will play an important role in the risk assessment of the aquifer sequestration.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">International Gas Union, IGU</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">13105</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CONGTP</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">149817</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">149817</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">217636</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BAAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">CD I249 1 0013788</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-04</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200025813</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">CD I249 1 0013788</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200025813</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-04 16:39:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-04</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARCHIVO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
