<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02163nmc a2200253   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260520005439.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260224s        xxu                 esp  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Espa&#xF1;ol</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">068.82 553.28 C62 2018 0015648</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Da&#xF1;o de formaci&#xF3;n en la cara de la fractura</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Implicancias en rocas tight, Cuenca del Golfo San Jorge</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">29/06/2022 ; 25/02/2019</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">8 p. ; 109-117</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Formation damage generates important deterioration in the petrophysical properties of the reservoirs. The case of this study corresponds to a well in the province of Santa Cruz, Argentina, with productions much lower than expected, coming from tight reservoirs (K &lt;0,1 mD). To evaluate the presence of damage, a new laboratory technique was applied to simulate a hydraulic frac stage during which the gelled fluid for frac remained in contact with the reservoir for more than thirty days. Samples of a core were analyzed by physical measurements, thin sections and scanning with the electronic microscopy before and after immersing the samples in the frac fluid under reservoir conditions and for a period of twenty days. The lithologies analyzed were fine tuffs, tobaceous sandstones and very fine tuffs and in all three there was evidence of formation damage. Zeolites and chlorites were the minerals most susceptible to alteration with the frac gelled fluid and the main damage mechanisms were the physical and chemical alteration of zeolites and the loss of crystallinity in chlorites, in both cases with possible formation of residues obstructing the limited permeable throats of tight reservoirs.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="g"></subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CONGTP</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ofeliz, Silvia</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">741</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Iovine, Gast&#xF3;n</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">742</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="111" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Congreso de Exploraci&#xF3;n y Desarrollo de Hidrocarburos (10mo. : 2018 nov. 5 - 9 : Mendoza)</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">573</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="111" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Simposio de Evaluaci&#xF3;n de Formaciones (2018 nov. 5 - 9 : Mendoza)</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">675</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Da&#xF1;o de formaci&#xF3;n</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">743</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Rocas tight</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">744</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">128423</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">128423</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://biblioteca.iapg.org.ar/ArchivosAdjuntos/Conexplor2018/SEF/1480.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">199345</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BVIAPG</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BVIAPG</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">068.82 553.28 C62 2018 0015648</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">200064920</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">068.82 553.28 C62 2018 0015648</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">200064920</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-02 23:26:23</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ARCHIVO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
