Image from Google Jackets

A simplified analytical method for estimating the productivity of a horizontal well producing at constant rate or constant pressure

By: Publication details: feb. 2009Description: 10 p. ; 77-87 In: Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering 64Summary: Transcripción del resúmen publicado por el autor: In this work, we present an analytical method for estimating the productivity of an infinite-conductivity horizontal well in a closed, box-shaped reservoir producing at either a constant rate or a constant pressure. It is based on approximate analytical solutions for the 2D inflow performance of an infinite-conductivity fracture in a rectangular drainage area and the near-well pressure drop for flow to a circular well in a vertical cross-section of the reservoir. The method can accommodate reservoirs with arbitrary horizontal and vertical aspect ratios, off-center wells, permeability anisotropy and skin factors. Being simple and straightforward, the method can be readily implemented in a standard spreadsheet program. Well productivities for depletion at constant rate are always higher than at constant pressure. The difference can be as much as 22% for a fully penetrating well in a thin, isotropic reservoir.
Item type: Artículo de Revista
Holdings
Current library Status Barcode
Biblioteca Alejandro Angel Bulgheroni Not for loan 200044498

Transcripción del resúmen publicado por el autor: In this work, we present an analytical method for estimating the productivity of an infinite-conductivity horizontal well in a closed, box-shaped reservoir producing at either a constant rate or a constant pressure. It is based on approximate analytical solutions for the 2D inflow performance of an infinite-conductivity fracture in a rectangular drainage area and the near-well pressure drop for flow to a circular well in a vertical cross-section of the reservoir. The method can accommodate reservoirs with arbitrary horizontal and vertical aspect ratios, off-center wells, permeability anisotropy and skin factors. Being simple and straightforward, the method can be readily implemented in a standard spreadsheet program. Well productivities for depletion at constant rate are always higher than at constant pressure. The difference can be as much as 22% for a fully penetrating well in a thin, isotropic reservoir.

1-4



Instituto Argentino del Petróleo y del Gas
Maipú 639 (C1006ACG) – Buenos Aires – Argentina
Tel: (54 11) 5277 IAPG (4274)
Lu - Vie 11 a 17 hs
Mail: biblio@iapg.org.ar


Copyright © 2026, Instituto Argentino del Petróleo y del Gas, todos los derechos reservados.

Protección de datos personales