COMPRENDER LAS ANOMALÍAS DE GRAVEDAD Y MAGNETISMO: SU ROL EN INTERPRETACIÓN SÍSMICA (Record no. 196023)

MARC details
000 -CABECERA
Cabecera 02628nmc a2200193 4500
005 - FECHA Y HORA DE LA ÚLTIMA TRANSACCIÓN
Fecha y hora de la última transacción 20260520010446.0
008 - CÓDIGOS DE INFORMACIÓN DE LONGITUD FIJA - INFORMACIÓN GENERAL
Códigos de información de longitud fija - Información general 260224s xxu
040 ## - FUENTE DE LA CATALOGACIÓN
Centro catalogador de origen BAAB
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number 068.82 553.28 C62 15730
100 1# - PUNTO DE ACCESO PRINCIPAL - NOMBRE DE PERSONA
Nombre de persona Sigismondi, Mario Emilio
111 2# - PUNTO DE ACCESO PRINCIPAL - NOMBRE DE CONGRESO
Nombre de congreso o jurisdicción como elemento de entrada Congreso de Exploración y Desarrollo de Hidrocarburos (11er : 2022 nov. 8 - 11 : Mendoza)
245 00 - MENCIÓN DE TÍTULO
Título COMPRENDER LAS ANOMALÍAS DE GRAVEDAD Y MAGNETISMO: SU ROL EN INTERPRETACIÓN SÍSMICA
270 ## - FECHA DE CARGA
FECHA DE CARGA 17/08/2023 ; 17/08/2023
300 ## - DESCRIPCIÓN FÍSICA
Extensión 26 p. ; 447-472
520 ## - NOTA DE RESUMEN
Resumen This presentation has a message as a seismic interpreter from my own experience on the use of potential methods for those who explore oil and gas, following the idea that there is a wider range of geophysical techniques that include magnetic, gravity, and seismic, among others. It is factual that 3D seismic remains critical, indeed indispensable, but a full geophysicist interpreter should have good knowledge, under favorable conditions also applied, that the combination of magnetic and gravity with seismic, can be used to reduce risk at key stages of the E&P process. However, inherent interpretationś ambiguity is the main argument against it. Contrary to this widespread notion, although, magnetic and gravity methods are equally effective for reducing risk at the more local scale typified by the prospect itself, even more in the Neuquén basin after three continuous decades of 3D seismic recording: not only in frontier areas but also in mature areas. Before that, I show that predictions in seismic interpretation may also have uncertainty: to identify ambiguous amplitude anomalies, or to imaging the structure and stratigraphic features, for example. The methodology will briefly review the conventional application of magnetic and gravity involved in comparing: the magnetics’ basement conversion to depth with respect to seismic image, attributes such as curvature to compare at regional scale with faults patterns, estimation of density distribution from modeling, and inversion. The examples used to illustrate my views have been taken from case studies that have 3D seismic, both in areas of Development, Exploration blocks, or New Frontier. The lesson learned suggests that oil companies should eventually have specialists who possess knowledge in potential and seismic methods to support interpretation, and who disseminate and advise innovative and robust solutions in the search for new resources
856 ## - LOCALIZACIÓN Y ACCESO ELECTRÓNICOS
Identificador Uniforme del Recurso (URI) https://biblioteca.iapg.org.ar/ArchivosAdjuntos/Conexplor2022/Geofísica/geofisica24.pdf
942 ## - DESC. DE MATERIAL
Tipo de material KOHA Congresos (trabajos presentados)
945 ## - OPERADOR
Operador Dominguez, Silvia
Holdings
Biblioteca/U. Información permanente Biblioteca/U. Información actual Fecha de adquisición Total Checkouts Signatura topográfica Número de inventario Fecha de carga Tipo de material KOHA
Biblioteca virtual Biblioteca virtual 06/03/2026   068.82 553.28 C62 15730 200068441 06/03/2026 Archivo electrónico


Instituto Argentino del Petróleo y del Gas
Maipú 639 (C1006ACG) – Buenos Aires – Argentina
Tel: (54 11) 5277 IAPG (4274)
Lu - Vie 11 a 17 hs
Mail: biblio@iapg.org.ar


Copyright © 2026, Instituto Argentino del Petróleo y del Gas, todos los derechos reservados.

Protección de datos personales