Evaluation of EnKF and Variants on the PUNQ-S3 Case (Record no. 187668)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02530nab a2200217 4500
008 - CÓDIGOS DE INFORMACIÓN DE LONGITUD FIJA - INFORMACIÓN GENERAL
Campo de control de longitud fija 260224s2012 xxu ing
041 ## - IDIOMA
Idioma Inglés
245 00 - TITULO
Título Evaluation of EnKF and Variants on the PUNQ-S3 Case
260 ## - PUBLICACION, DISTRIBUCION, ETC
Lugar de publicación, distribución, etc.
Nombre de publicador, distribuidor, etc.
Fecha de publicación, distribución, etc. sept./oct. 2012
270 ## - FECHA DE CARGA
Fecha de carga 09/05/2013 ; 09/05/2013
300 ## - DESCRIPCION FISICA
Otra extensión 14 p. ; 841-855
520 ## - RESUMEN, ETC
Resumen Traducción del resúmen del autor: Over the last decade the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) has attracted attention as a promising method for solving the reservoir history matching problem: updating model parameters so that the model output matches the measured production data. The method possesses unique qualities, such as; it provides real-time updates and uncertainty quantification of the estimate, it can estimate any physical property at hand and it is easy to implement. The method does, however, have its limitations; in particular, it is derived based on an assumption of a Gaussian distribution of variables and measurement errors. Several refinements have been proposed to overcome the shortcomings of the EnKF. These refinements are, however, mainly tested on synthetic cases addressing one shortcoming at a time, not containing or combining the complexity and the high nonlinearity of a real field case. In this paper, we investigate some of the refined methods on a nonlinear reservoir, the 3D, three-phase, PUNQ-S3 model. We compare the performance of the original EnKF with the performance of the ensemble square root filter (EnSRF), an EnKF method with localization, which is named the hierarchical ensemble Kalman filter (HEnKF) and the newly proposed Adaptive Gaussian Mixture filter (AGM). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time the EnKF and the EnSRF have been compared on a high-dimensional nonlinear field case. Overall, we see that the AGM and HEnKF work better than the EnSRF and EnKF. The EnSRF seems to have a slightly better performance than the EnKF. However, the introduction of a localization procedure (as in the HEnKF) seems to be much more influential than replacing the EnKF with the EnSRF. Comparing the top two methods, the AGM is preferable over the HEnKF, both when it comes to preserving the initial geology of the ensemble and to the consistency of the predictions.
581 ## - ESTADO DE COLECCIÓN
Estado de colección 5
773 0# - CORRECCIÓN
Título Oil and Gas Science and Technology
Partes relacionadas 67
942 ## - DESC. DE MATERIAL
Tipo de item KOHA Artículo de Revista
100 1# - RESPONSABLE PERSONAL
Apellido, Nombre Valestrand, R.
9 (RLIN) 53129
100 1# - RESPONSABLE PERSONAL
Apellido, Nombre Naevdal, G.
9 (RLIN) 53130
100 1# - RESPONSABLE PERSONAL
Apellido, Nombre Stordal, A.S.
9 (RLIN) 53131
Holdings
Biblioteca propietaria Biblioteca actual Fecha de adquisición Inventario Total de préstamos Inventario Fecha de carga Tipo de item KOHA
Biblioteca Alejandro Angel Bulgheroni Biblioteca Alejandro Angel Bulgheroni 06/03/2026 200059805   200059805 06/03/2026 Artículo de Revista


Instituto Argentino del Petróleo y del Gas
Maipú 639 (C1006ACG) – Buenos Aires – Argentina
Tel: (54 11) 5277 IAPG (4274)
Lu - Vie 11 a 17 hs
Mail: biblio@iapg.org.ar


Copyright © 2026, Instituto Argentino del Petróleo y del Gas, todos los derechos reservados.

Protección de datos personales