Optimization of Foam Enhanced Oil Recovery (Record no. 187585)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02010nab a2200193 4500 |
| 008 - CÓDIGOS DE INFORMACIÓN DE LONGITUD FIJA - INFORMACIÓN GENERAL | |
| Campo de control de longitud fija | 260224s2013 xxu ing |
| 041 ## - IDIOMA | |
| Idioma | Inglés |
| 245 00 - TITULO | |
| Título | Optimization of Foam Enhanced Oil Recovery |
| Subtítulo | Balancing Sweep and Injectivity |
| 260 ## - PUBLICACION, DISTRIBUCION, ETC | |
| Lugar de publicación, distribución, etc. | |
| Nombre de publicador, distribuidor, etc. | |
| Fecha de publicación, distribución, etc. | feb. 2013 |
| 270 ## - FECHA DE CARGA | |
| Fecha de carga | 09/04/2013 ; 09/04/2013 |
| 300 ## - DESCRIPCION FISICA | |
| Otra extensión | 8 p. ; 51-59 |
| 520 ## - RESUMEN, ETC | |
| Resumen | Transcripción del resumen del autor: Foam is a means of improving sweep efficiency that reduces the gas mobility by capturing gas in foam bubbles and hindering its movement. Foam enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) techniques are relatively expensive; hence, it is important to optimize their performance. We present a case study on the conflict between mobility control and injectivity in optimizing oil recovery in a foam EOR process in a simple 3D reservoir with constrained injection and production pressures. Specifically, we examine a surfactant-alternating-gas (SAG) process in which the surfactant-slug size is optimized. The maximum oil recovery is obtained with a surfactant slug just sufficient to advance the foam front just short of the production well. In other words, the reservoir is partially unswept by foam at the optimum surfactant-slug size. If a larger surfactant slug is used and the foam front breaks through to the production well, productivity index (PI) is seriously reduced and oil recovery is less than optimal: The benefit of sweeping the far corners of the pattern does not compensate for the harm to PI. A similar effect occurs near the injection well: Small surfactant slugs harm injectivity with little or no benefit to sweep. Larger slugs give better sweep with only a modest decrease in injectivity until the foam front approaches the production well. In some cases, SAG is inferior to gasflood (Namdar Zanganeh 2011). |
| 581 ## - ESTADO DE COLECCIÓN | |
| Estado de colección | 1 |
| 773 0# - CORRECCIÓN | |
| Título | SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering |
| Partes relacionadas | 16 |
| 942 ## - DESC. DE MATERIAL | |
| Tipo de item KOHA | Artículo de Revista |
| 100 1# - RESPONSABLE PERSONAL | |
| Apellido, Nombre | Zanganeh, M. Namdar |
| 9 (RLIN) | 52967 |
| Biblioteca propietaria | Biblioteca actual | Fecha de adquisición | Inventario | Total de préstamos | Inventario | Fecha de carga | Tipo de item KOHA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biblioteca Alejandro Angel Bulgheroni | Biblioteca Alejandro Angel Bulgheroni | 06/03/2026 | 200059716 | 200059716 | 06/03/2026 | Artículo de Revista |
